[2021] | Nut Jobs Author

Why do we read these people? Why does a sane person spend a rainy Sunday annotating a book that claims the moon landing was faked by lizard people who are also the Rothschilds?

In the hushed, orderly halls of literary culture, the term “nut job” is an insult. In the smoky backrooms of cult fandom, it is a badge of honor. The Nut Jobs Author is the figure who has broken through the polite constraints of genre, sanity, and plausibility, dragging the reader into a labyrinth built from equal parts genius and delusion. They are the paranoid, the messianic, the fabulists who have come to believe their own metaphors. And literature is better—stranger, fiercer, more alive—because of them.

But the true Nut Jobs Author does not live in the past. They are publishing right now, on obscure presses or Amazon Kindle Direct, sending screeds to literary magazines that delete them unread. nut jobs author

This is the most lovable archetype. The Holy Fool writes a 1,200-page sci-fi/fantasy/horror/romance epic in which the grammar is optional, the plot relies on the concept of “quantum feelings,” and the hero defeats the Dark Lord by crying really hard. Think before he invented Scientology—his Battlefield Earth is a masterpiece of delusional pacing and accidental comedy. Or think of the self-published sensation Vernon Sullivan (a pseudonym of Boris Vian, who pretended to be a black American author translating his own work from a non-existent English original). The Holy Fool believes they are writing the next Dune . They are writing a beautiful, insane, unreadable fever dream. And we are richer for it.

Of course, there is a dark side. Not every nut job is a Burroughs or a Pound. Many are just bigots with word processors. The line between “outsider visionary” and “hateful crank” is thin and bloody. The manifesto of the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski ( Industrial Society and Its Future ), is a perfectly logical, brilliantly argued, utterly insane text. It is also a blueprint for murder. The literary world has a hard time with this. We want our crazies to be lovable, like crying about the Dharma Bums. We don’t want them building bombs. Why do we read these people

Then there is the gentle giant of American letters, . A heroin addict, accidental murderer, and occultist, Burroughs believed that language itself was a virus from outer space. His cut-up technique—scissors to a newspaper, rearranged at random—wasn't a gimmick. It was a magical ritual to exorcise control. His masterpiece, Naked Lunch , is less a novel than a splatter of fever dreams, talking assholes, and bureaucratic nightmare logic. Was he a genius? Undoubtedly. Was he a nut job? He shot a glass off his wife’s head and missed, killing her. He spent decades trying to communicate with a telepathic soul-fragment of a Mayan god. The answer is yes.

So raise a glass to the paranoid, the grandiose, the delusional, the obsessive. Raise a glass to the author who replied to your polite rejection email with a 10,000-word treatise on how you are a pawn of the psychic vampires. They are annoying, exhausting, and often wrong. In the smoky backrooms of cult fandom, it

To understand the species, we must break it down. There are three primary archetypes of the Nut Jobs Author.